Home News Artists deserve ‘fairness and control’ over AI use, says SoundExchange CEO

Artists deserve ‘fairness and control’ over AI use, says SoundExchange CEO

by WeeklyAINews
0 comment

Be part of high executives in San Francisco on July 11-12, to listen to how leaders are integrating and optimizing AI investments for fulfillment. Learn More


Anybody who watched OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s testimony earlier than a Senate panel on Tuesday immediately realized concerning the Washington, DC-based nonprofit Sound Exchange, a music expertise group based 20 years in the past to gather royalties from digital music platforms and distribute them to music creators.

Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) repeatedly grilled Altman over how songwriters and musical artists ought to be compensated when their works are utilized by AI corporations. She instructed Altman that the Nashville music group “ought to be capable to determine if their copyrighted songs and pictures are going for use to coach these fashions,” and requested him if he favored one thing like SoundExchange for the gathering and distribution of cash to compensate artists.

Whereas Altman stated he had “by no means heard” of SoundExchange, he agreed that “content material creators want to learn from this expertise.”

Michael Huppe, president and CEO of SoundExchange, and an adjunct professor in music regulation at Georgetown College, instructed VentureBeat he was “gratified” by Blackburn’s feedback, given the fast-moving panorama the place a song created by AI to sound like Drake and The Weeknd can go viral; Grimes can launch a platform the place anybody can use their voice to create AI-generated songs; and Timbaland can use AI to launch a tune with the long-deceased Infamous B.I.G.

“I wish to applaud Senator Blackburn for having the foresight to acknowledge we’ve acquired to determine a solution to permit the artistic class to correctly take part on this regime,” Huppe instructed VentureBeat. “AI just isn’t going away. So I used to be happy to see Senator Blackburn specializing in the artistic class — the necessity to compensate them, the necessity to shield their work.”

See also  How Arnica's CEO foresees generative AI's impact on DevOps security

Not nearly artists — even the NFL is worried

How AI growth impacts artistic employees isn’t just concerning the music business, Huppe emphasised. He pointed to the March launch of the Human Artistry Campaign, a set of ideas that define the accountable use of AI to “help human creativity and accomplishment with respect to the inimitable worth of human artistry and expression.” The marketing campaign, he stated, has been joined by over 100 organizations representing songwriters, musicians, authors, literary brokers, publishers, voice actors and photographers — in addition to non-artistic entities like sports activities organizations, together with the Main League Baseball Gamers Affiliation and the NFL Gamers Affiliation.

Why sports activities? “Many gamers revenue off their title, picture and likeness,” stated Huppe. “So this isn’t nearly copyright once we discuss what occurs [with AI]. It’s additionally how generative AI — whether or not textual content, pictures, audio or video — can capitalize on those that have constructed up their model and persona. You’ve another person making an attempt to capitalize on that with out permission.”

Artistic class “getting louder” about AI

The underside line, Huppe stated, is that how AI makes use of creators’ work ought to be their selection. “It’s about equity and management, in order that the artistic class can’t simply have this stuff taken away from them.”

Huppe identified that there’s already a nascent market growing of individuals licensing their works for AI, equivalent to how OpenAI licensed pictures from Shutterstock to coach its fashions. “You’ll be able to think about a world the place that begins to be the norm,” he stated, “the place there’s an organized licensing construction and moral AI corporations can know what’s allowed to be scraped and what’s off-limits … and the place they share a part of their income with the artistic group.”

See also  OpenAI thinks superhuman AI is coming -- and wants to build tools to control it

With different industries pushing again on generative AI — together with lawsuits filed by visible artists, striking Hollywood writers and unionizing journalists — and celebrities like Justine Bateman and Sting talking out, Huppe stated the artistic class “is getting louder as we converse.”

Music, he stated, has typically been like “the marines on the seaside” on the subject of coping with new applied sciences that finally have an effect on all industries: “There’s nearly no business that doesn’t have the chance of being actually impacted by generative AI. It’s on all people’s thoughts.”

Source link

You may also like

logo

Welcome to our weekly AI News site, where we bring you the latest updates on artificial intelligence and its never-ending quest to take over the world! Yes, you heard it right – we’re not here to sugarcoat anything. Our tagline says it all: “because robots are taking over the world.”

Subscribe

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

© 2023 – All Right Reserved.