Final June, simply months after the discharge of ChatGPT from OpenAI, a few New York Metropolis legal professionals infamously used the software to write a very poor brief. The AI cited pretend circumstances, resulting in an uproar, an indignant choose and two very embarrassed attorneys. It was proof that whereas bots like ChatGPT could be useful, you actually should verify their work fastidiously, particularly in a authorized context.
The case didn’t escape the oldsters at LexisNexis, a authorized software program firm that gives tooling to assist legal professionals discover the proper case legislation to make their authorized arguments. The corporate sees the potential of AI in serving to scale back a lot of the mundane authorized work that each lawyer undertakes, but it surely additionally acknowledges these very actual points because it begins its generative AI journey.
Jeff Reihl, chief know-how officer at LexisNexis, understands the worth of AI. In actual fact, his firm has been constructing the know-how into its platform for a while now. However with the ability to add ChatGPT-like performance to its authorized toolbox would assist legal professionals work extra effectively: serving to with transient writing and discovering citations quicker.
“We as a corporation have been working with AI applied sciences for various years. I feel what is basically, actually totally different now since ChatGPT got here out in November, is the chance to generate textual content and the conversational points that include this know-how,” Reihl informed TechCrunch+.